GO TO www.sexy-robots-videos.com and http for more life-like robots information, videos and photos. Festo, has developed a graceful robot inspired by a creature of the sea. In fact, they have developed two versions, both based on the common jellyfish: the AquaJelly and the AirJelly. According to Festo, the AquaJelly is “an artificial autonomous jellyfish with an electric drive and an intelligent, adaptive mechanical system.” Apparently the idea is to have several of the robots autonomously working together using a communication system composed of Zigbee short-range radio on the surface and LEDs when underwater. As for the AirJelly, this remote controlled device can glide through the air using a helium-filled ballonet, a central electric drive and an intelligent, adaptive mechanical system. Apparently, this design offers “fascinating possibilities for “lighter-than-air” aviation.” I’m not sure about all of that, but I can at see how the technology behind the AquaJelly could have some practical application on complex underwater projects.
Popular Posts:
- Jailbreak For 4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/5.0/4.0.1/4.0/3.1.3/3.2 IPad & iPhone 5 3G/3Gs & iPhone 5
- Installing Virtue OLED Board & Laser Eyes in Dye DM9 Paintball Gun
- How can I put Movies on my HTC HD2 for free?
- The Five Best and Five Worst Mountain Dews of All Time (GeekDad Wayback Machine)
- How to set my default location on HTC Hero Android weather widget?
Great video keep up the good work.
WOW!
I want to ride in an airjelly soooooo bad! Screw hot air balloons!
Gosh! These are super pretty!
These devices are made by hand using very expensive materials. The Aquajelly is probably the most expensive because the electronics are housed in a laser sintered pressure vessel!
@mermaidsaphire100 “Really!” Do you know were I can buy one for that price?
why aren’t these being sold at walmart yet!!?
these things sell 4 around $500 :O
@LucifersDisciple6
Lol, twat.
@DazmoTube Hahaha, idiot.
@LucifersDisciple6
Do you believe that your first question is relevant to this video, or any fucking thing discussed under it? if so you, douchefuck, are retarded.
If not, you’re still fucking retarded for trying to get youtube to help with your 7th grade science homework.
@DazmoTube Do you believe that CO2 is bad for the planet ? if so you sir are retarded.
Do you believe Sodium Fluoride is good for you ? if so you sir are retarded.
Both are false by the way.
@erinshunny
computers merely contain the thoughts of men. They are a series of switches designed to store instructions created in the minds of programmers. Science is merely observation. Creativity wins.
@kOkiLLaR
True or false:
Science is based on the scientific method, and as such is not in a position to reveal truths about anything which cannot be observed, Including but not limited to the existential status of that which cannot be observed.
@TheKamikazeen
1st – The Bible? seriously?
2nd “Family Guy” is a cartoon. It offers no “world view” whatsoever. depressing?
3rd Am I so brainwashed that I accept modern science for what ignorant fucks claims it is? (no)
I know you are just a troll, so don’t take this personally. Your comment exemplifies the overwhelming, lazy tendency to follow trends, at the expense of actually thinking, that is prevalent today. Give up the cartoons and sci-fi movies and learn some fucking math. Dipshit.
@DazmoTube The bible has never given any kind of scientific evidence to anything, it does not give you any type of greater understanding of our world, It’s just silly storybook, like “The Little Mermaid”. The Bible are full of shit, even the world-view of “Family Guy” is alot more accurate and realistic.
Give up your religious shit and accept the world for what it really is. You’ve been brainwashed, take the red pill.
wtf do you have $#!t in your eyes? go watch some real jellyfish
wtf do you have shit in your eyes? go watch some real jellyfish
i wonder if these would “survive” in the wild.
@kOkiLLaR
Scientists love to assume that because the empirical approach to observing NATURE yields only information about the NATURAL world, that there is nothing which exist EXCLUSIVE to the natural world. I’ts classic stupidity.
@kOkiLLaR
you say “wrong on every count” but you REALLY mean to say is “I dont like what you said, and I base that on absolutely nothing whatsoever. In fact, you’re probably right, but I’m just too stupid to comprehend what you just said – or I didn’t actually take the time to read it. Probably the latter. Most fucks like me defend science, scientists, scientism, and scientology because we think computers are ‘purdy’”
Don’t feel bad though. There are plenty of morons like you on youtube. tc!
@DazmoTube Wrong on every count. If you’re going to write an argument criticizing science, the scientific method or scientific community, try writing something that actually has merit. Science isn’t perfect and there are legitimate criticisms that can be leveled at it; unfortunately your petty message lacked any such thing.
@DazmoTube
Wrong on every count. If you’re going to write an argument criticizing science, the scientific method or scientific community, try writing something that actually has merit. Science isn’t perfect and there are legitimate criticisms that can be leveled at it; unfortunately your petty message lacked any such thing.
my first reaction was that this is really pretty and kick ass!… then I realized that this could be the future of our aquariums ;-;